sna: Mollify an assert to allow us to call busy_ioctl on a GTT write

The code was being careful in making sure that only a BO with an
outstanding GPU write was being flushed. We need to relax that
assertion to allow us to call busy_ioctl after only GTT writes.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Chris Wilson 2013-06-11 15:10:06 +01:00
parent 7d91051c50
commit 1392f296a3
2 changed files with 10 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -4182,16 +4182,14 @@ void _kgem_bo_destroy(struct kgem *kgem, struct kgem_bo *bo)
void __kgem_flush(struct kgem *kgem, struct kgem_bo *bo)
{
assert(bo->rq);
assert(bo->exec == NULL);
assert(bo->needs_flush);
/* The kernel will emit a flush *and* update its own flushing lists. */
if (!__kgem_busy(kgem, bo->handle))
if (bo->exec == NULL && !__kgem_busy(kgem, bo->handle))
__kgem_bo_clear_busy(bo);
DBG(("%s: handle=%d, busy?=%d\n",
__FUNCTION__, bo->handle, bo->rq != NULL));
DBG(("%s: handle=%d, busy?=%d, flushed?=%d\n",
__FUNCTION__, bo->handle, bo->rq != NULL, bo->exec == NULL));
}
inline static bool needs_semaphore(struct kgem *kgem, struct kgem_bo *bo)

View File

@ -338,10 +338,15 @@ static inline void kgem_bo_flush(struct kgem *kgem, struct kgem_bo *bo)
return;
/* If the kernel fails to emit the flush, then it will be forced when
* we assume direct access. And as the useual failure is EIO, we do
* not actualy care.
* we assume direct access. And as the usual failure is EIO, we do
* not actually care.
*/
__kgem_flush(kgem, bo);
/* Whatever actually happens, we can regard the GTT write domain
* as being flushed.
*/
bo->gtt_dirty = false;
}
static inline struct kgem_bo *kgem_bo_reference(struct kgem_bo *bo)