Aurelien
/
xf86-video-intel
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

sna: secure batches accepted upstream, so simply use runtime detection 

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Chris Wilson 2012-10-17 22:16:29 +01:00
parent 540666a0a8
commit 8238c67298
2 changed files with 0 additions and 14 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
configure.ac
View File

@ -292,15 +292,6 @@ if test "x$USERPTR" = xyes; then
AC_DEFINE(USE_USERPTR,1,[Assume USERPTR support])
fi
AC_ARG_ENABLE(secure-batches,
AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-secure-batches],
[Enable use of secure batches (experimental) [default=no]]),
[SECURE_BATCHES="$enableval"],
[SECURE_BATCHES=no])
if test "x$SECURE_BATCHES" = xyes; then
AC_DEFINE(USE_SECURE_BATCHES,1,[Test for kernel support of secure batches])
fi
AC_ARG_ENABLE(async-swap,
AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-async-swap],
[Enable use of asynchronous swaps (experimental) [default=no]]),

5
src/sna/kgem.c
View File

@ -72,11 +72,6 @@ search_snoop_cache(struct kgem *kgem, unsigned int num_pages, unsigned flags);
#define DBG_NO_SECURE_BATCHES 0
#define DBG_DUMP 0
#ifndef USE_SECURE_BATCHES
#undef DBG_NO_SECURE_BATCHES
#define DBG_NO_SECURE_BATCHES 1
#endif
#define SHOW_BATCH 0
/* Worst case seems to be 965gm where we cannot write within a cacheline that