It seems that indirect data upper bound check in STATE_BASE_ADDRESS

is not acting like what bspec told on 965gm.
  G45+ follow bspec, but we have to set it to a large value for 965gm.
This commit is contained in:
Zou Nan hai 2009-08-05 15:00:37 +08:00
parent af45482a52
commit f4e4c1a854
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ static void state_base_address()
OUT_BATCH(0 | BASE_ADDRESS_MODIFY);
OUT_BATCH(0 | BASE_ADDRESS_MODIFY);
OUT_BATCH(0 | BASE_ADDRESS_MODIFY);
OUT_BATCH(BASE_ADDRESS_MODIFY);
OUT_BATCH(0xFFFFFF|BASE_ADDRESS_MODIFY);
ADVANCE_BATCH();
}